Shurpanakha

Mist was still lifting off the Godavari when she found the hut at Panchavati. The night fire had burned down and the clearing smelled of wet ash. Inside the leaf shelter Rama sat with Sita and his brother, telling stories, and the woman coming up the path stopped and looked at him for a long moment before she said anything at all.

She had been walking that forest alone for a long time. The Dandaka belonged to her people, and she moved through it the way an owner moves through a house, taking any shape that suited the hour, frightening off anything that did not run first. Nothing in those trees had given her a reason to be careful in years.

Valmiki refuses to let her have the moment. He builds the scene as a column of mismatches, one line at a time: her face against his face, her belly against his waist, her squinting eyes against his wide ones, her copper hair against his neat tresses, her voice like struck brass against his soft one. She is old, he is young. She talks crooked, he talks straight. The poet takes his laugh, and the audience is told exactly how to see her before she has spoken a word.

What she actually says is not comic. She gives her name, her house and her terms, all in order. Shurpanakha, daughter of the sage Vishrava. Sister of Ravana who rules Lanka. Sister of Kumbhakarna who sleeps for months at a stretch, and of Vibhishana who never did behave the way a rakshasa is supposed to. Khara and Dushana, famous for war, are her brothers too. She can wear any form she likes, she goes where she pleases, and she is not asking for a favour. She is proposing marriage, and she assumes it will be accepted.

She had been married once already. The fuller tellings say her husband was a Danava prince, Vidyutjihva, and that it was Ravana who killed him. A brother had taken one husband from her before any of this began.

Rama’s answer is a joke, and it is airtight. He is married, he says, and a co-wife would only make her wretched; but his younger brother has come to the forest without a wife, and a man of that quality would suit a woman of hers. Every clause is technically true. Lakshmana, who has a wife back in Ayodhya and knows perfectly well what his brother is doing, plays the same game straight back. Why settle for a servant’s wife, he asks. Aim at Rama, who will surely throw over the disfigured, dishonest, hollow-bellied old woman he is currently saddled with. He is quoting her. Those are the exact words she had used about Sita a few minutes earlier, handed back with the polish still on them.

It is a very good line, and it destroys her, because she believes it. She goes at Sita the way Valmiki says a meteor goes at Rohini, the brightest star in the sky. Rama catches her mid-lunge and tells his brother that punning with brutes was a mistake, and that it would be fitting now to disfigure her. Lakshmana draws his sword and takes off her ears and her nose while Rama watches.

She went into the trees screaming, arms wrapped around herself, blood coming off her in sheets, and did not stop until Janasthana, where she dropped at Khara’s feet like a thunderbolt falling out of an empty sky.

After that the arithmetic runs away from everybody. Khara sends fourteen rakshasas to kill the brothers and loses all fourteen. He comes himself with fourteen thousand and loses those too, along with Dushana and his own life. So she goes to Lanka, into her eldest brother’s hall, and does the one thing that cannot be undone: she describes Sita. Waist, eyes, hair, the whole inventory, laid out in front of a brother who collects. Ravana takes Sita out of the forest in a chariot, and the war that ends with Lanka burning began with a woman’s face opened up over a joke.

The tradition has never entirely agreed on her. Kamban, writing the Ramayana in Tamil, gives her beauty and loneliness instead of a pot belly, and lets her longing look like longing. The Sanskrit Adhyatma Ramayana and Tulsidas in Old Hindi each move the blame around, and Kathleen Erndl’s comparison of five versions of the mutilation showed how much the episode shifts depending on who is holding the pen. Jain authors call her Chandranakha, whose nails were like the moon, and say the other name was what people called her. Modern novelists have taken her side outright.

Her powers are real and they are useless to her here. She can change form at will, she is strong enough to walk the deep forest alone, and she has the reach of Lanka behind her, which is why fourteen thousand soldiers march on a personal insult. What she does not have is a fight. She never lands a blow on anyone. Her weapon is speech, and speech is precisely what is turned against her: two clever men trade puns over her head until she mistakes mockery for consent, and by the time she understands the joke there is a sword already moving. She can wear a hundred faces and cannot keep the one she has.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Shurpanakha in the Ramayana?

Shurpanakha is a rakshasi, the sister of the demon king Ravana, and a daughter of the sage Vishrava. She meets Rama in the Dandaka forest at Panchavati, falls in love with him and proposes marriage. Her rejection and mutilation set off the chain of events that leads to Sita’s abduction and the war with Lanka.

Why did Lakshmana cut off Shurpanakha’s nose?

After Rama and Lakshmana rebuffed her with a series of puns, Shurpanakha took Lakshmana’s mocking words literally and attacked Sita. Rama restrained her and told his brother it would be fitting to disfigure her, and Lakshmana drew his sword and cut off her ears and nose. In Valmiki’s text both ears and the nose are taken, though later retellings often mention only the nose.

What does the name Shurpanakha mean?

The Sanskrit name combines śūrpa, the flat winnowing basket used to separate grain from chaff, with nakha, meaning nail or claw, so it means roughly “she whose nails are like winnowing fans.” Jain versions call her Chandranakha instead, meaning her nails were like the moon.

How did Shurpanakha cause the war in the Ramayana?

After she was disfigured she fled to her brother Khara at Janasthana, who sent fourteen rakshasas and then an army of fourteen thousand against Rama, all of whom were killed. She then went to Ravana in Lanka and described Sita’s beauty to him in detail, which prompted Ravana to abduct Sita and brought on the war.

Is Shurpanakha portrayed the same way in every version?

No. Valmiki describes her as old, pot-bellied and coarse, while the Tamil Ramavataram of Kamban presents her as beautiful and lovelorn and treats her desire sympathetically. The Adhyatma Ramayana, Tulsidas’s Ramcaritmanas and modern retellings each shift the blame differently, and contemporary novelists have recast her as a wronged woman rather than a villain.

Related Entries

Ravana, Rama, Sita, Rakshasa, Hanuman, Jatayu, Sampati, Vanara, Asura, Danava, Daitya, Vishnu