Al-‘Uzzá

Heat comes off the sandstone at Umm Jadhāyidh well before noon, and the rock along the old caravan road holds it like a stove. Travellers stopping there between Hegra and Petra scratched their names into the cliff while the camels drank. Four of them scratched something more than a name. *May al-ʿUzzā hear* so-and-so, the letters shallow and quick, cut by someone who had a long way still to go and wanted someone listening.

That is about as close as the ancient record lets anyone get to her.

Her name is not really a name. Al-ʿUzzā is an Arabic feminine superlative, something like the Most Mighty, and the two goddesses usually spoken of alongside her are named the same blunt way: al-Lāt, the Goddess, and Manāt, Allotment. Arabian religion had a habit of addressing its powers by what they were rather than by what anyone called them, which turns tracing any one of them backwards into an exercise in following an adjective. Where her cult began, the record does not settle. She surfaces in Sabaic and Qatabanic, in Nabataean, and in Arabic, across three scripts and three regions, and no source narrates a beginning for her.

By the sixth century she was the greatest of the three in and around Mecca. Hishām ibn al-Kalbī, cataloguing the idols of the Arabs in the eighth century when the practice was already a memory, gives her the longest entry in his book. Her sanctuary lay in the valley of Nakhla near Qudayd, east of Mecca on the road toward Ta’if, and three trees there were sacred to her. Over the place stood a house called Buss, where people came for oracular answers. The Quraysh, he writes, held her the greatest of their idols. They journeyed to her, brought her gifts, and sought her favour through sacrifice. They also named their sons ʿAbd al-ʿUzzā, which says more about a cult’s reach than any temple inventory could.

A pilgrim arriving at Nakhla would have smelled the place before seeing it, burnt fat and incense caught under the trees, and the custodians from Banū Shaybān waiting in the shade. Someone took the animal. Someone else took the gift. The question went into the dark of the house and came back out as an answer.

Her name was also a battle cry. At Uhud the Meccan line went into the fight shouting for her and for Hubal, the two powers standing behind the city.

Then the Qur’an named her. Sūrat al-Najm sets the three of them in a row and asks what they are, al-Lāt and al-ʿUzzā, and Manāt, the third, the other. A tradition preserved in Ibn Isḥāq and al-Ṭabarī holds that a different line was recited first, calling the three *gharānīq*, high-flying birds whose intercession might be hoped for, and that it was then withdrawn. The tradition is old and it is contested; most Muslim scholarship rejects the episode as a later fabrication, and the argument has never quite closed. What nobody disputes is that the verses as they stand refuse her.

The end came in Ramadan of the eighth year after the Hijra, in 630. Khālid ibn al-Walīd rode to Nakhla, cut down a tree, and returned to report that nothing had happened. He was sent back. He cut the second, and again nothing. On the third approach a woman came at him with her hair loose and wild, and the shrine’s custodian called on al-ʿUzzā to defend herself. Khālid struck her down and she came apart into ash. That was her, he was told afterwards. She will not be worshipped again.

North of Mecca she had been something considerably grander. In the Nabataean kingdom she stood near the top of the pantheon, and the Temple of the Winged Lions at Petra, a colonnaded complex raised on a promontory above the city centre in the reign of Aretas IV, was built to honour her. A monumental stair climbed to it. Inside, a raised podium sat in a forest of columns, and the dozen columns closest to it carried the winged-lion capitals that give the ruin its modern name. Under Hellenistic influence she was assimilated to Aphrodite and to Venus, and paired with al-Kutbā, the Scribe, whom Greek and Roman observers read as Mercury.

The Nabataeans did not give her a face. What they gave her was a betyl: a squared block of stone carrying two eyes, cut sometimes as rectangles and sometimes as small stars, a straight nose, and no mouth. Blocks of that kind stand at Petra and in Wādī Ramm, usually beside a plain unfeatured stone belonging to al-Kutbā or to the Lord of the Temple. At Hegra one of hers was found alongside such a plain block, with an inscription dedicating an entire mountain to the pair of them as an open-air sanctuary. Nobody knows what stood at Nakhla.

In the south she appears as ʿUzzayan, the same name wearing the South Arabian article. She is on Sabaic amulets and in a scatter of dedications. One man gave a golden image on behalf of his sick daughter, whose own name meant the Maid of ʿUzzayan. Three people on an incense altar call her their solar deity, meaning something close to their good fortune. In Qatabān she and one other deity are named the two protectors of the royal palace at Ḥarib, and a woman had her protection carved onto a small female bust. A dedicant on a bronze plaque addressed her as “his lord”, the gender sliding without comment, which was apparently common enough in Qatabanic to pass unremarked.

Then there is the strange part. For a goddess this famous in the later literature, the ancient graffiti barely mention her. The Safaitic and Hismaic corpora run to tens of thousands of texts scratched by herders across the northern deserts, thick with prayers to other gods, and they contain no prayers to al-ʿUzzā at all. There is one possible occurrence in a broken Dadanitic inscription and one very doubtful Hismaic reading. Otherwise she survives in people’s names, in men called ʿUzayy and ʿAbd al-ʿUzzā, which is attestation of a kind but not the kind that tells you what anyone wanted from her. Her literary fame and her epigraphic footprint do not match, and the gap looks real rather than an accident of what happened to survive.

What people did ask her for is legible where they say it outright. Hearing comes first, since the road graffiti ask for nothing else. Then protection, of a palace, of a daughter, of a traveller between wells. Victory, at Uhud. And answers, carried out of the house at Buss to whoever had brought something worth the journey. Nothing in the record makes her a specialist in one thing. She was invoked because she was the strongest thing on offer.

Her limits were the limits of a god who lives in objects. She was in three trees, a stone and a building, and every one of them could be reached by a man with an axe and orders. There is a subtler limit too. A name meaning the Most Mighty is a name any sufficiently mighty goddess can wear, and in central Arabia her identity and al-Lāt’s appear to have run together until it is difficult to say where one stops. The strongest goddess in Arabia was, in the end, an adjective that more than one being could answer to.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who was Al-‘Uzzá?

Al-‘Uzzá was a pre-Islamic Arabian goddess whose name means roughly “the Most Mighty”. She was the greatest of the three goddesses worshipped in western Arabia alongside al-Lāt and Manāt, and Hishām ibn al-Kalbī records that the Quraysh of Mecca held her the greatest of all their idols. She was also worshipped in Nabataean territory to the north and in South Arabia under the name ʿUzzayan.

Where was Al-‘Uzzá worshipped?

Her principal Arabian sanctuary was in the valley of Nakhla near Qudayd, east of Mecca on the road toward Ta’if, where three trees were sacred to her and a house called Buss delivered oracular answers. Further north, the Temple of the Winged Lions at Petra was built to honour her during the reign of the Nabataean king Aretas IV. Her name also appears in South Arabian dedications and on Sabaic amulets, and in graffiti along the caravan route between Hegra and Petra.

What happened to Al-‘Uzzá’s shrine?

It was destroyed in Ramadan of the eighth year after the Hijra, in 630, when Khālid ibn al-Walīd was sent to Nakhla. He cut down the first two sacred trees without incident, and at the third a woman with wild loose hair came at him; the shrine’s custodian called on Al-‘Uzzá, Khālid struck the woman down, and she collapsed into ash. He was told afterwards that this had been the goddess and that she would never be worshipped again.

What did Al-‘Uzzá look like?

No source describes the idol at Nakhla, but the Nabataeans represented her as a betyl, a squared block of stone bearing two eyes carved as rectangles or small stars, a nose, and no mouth. Betyls of this type survive at Petra and in Wādī Ramm, usually set beside a plain featureless block representing another deity. Under Hellenistic influence she was also assimilated to Aphrodite and Venus, which brought her into the orbit of classical goddess imagery.

Is Al-‘Uzzá mentioned in the Qur’an?

Yes. Sūrat al-Najm names her together with al-Lāt and Manāt and rejects them as objects of worship. A disputed tradition preserved in Ibn Isḥāq and al-Ṭabarī claims that an earlier version of the passage called the three *gharānīq* and allowed for their intercession before being withdrawn, but most Muslim scholarship treats that episode as a later fabrication.

Related Entries

Al-Lāt, Manāt, Allah, Djinn, Ghoul, Ifrit, Marid, Al-mi’raj, Bahamut, Ishtar, Inanna, Aphrodite, Venus, Asherah